<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rational Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rationalphilosophy.net/index.php/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rationalphilosophy.net</link>
	<description>Using philosophy, reason and logic in life, to find meaning, purpose and peace.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Philosophy of Happiness&#8230; And Unhappiness by Winton Bates</title>
		<link>http://rationalphilosophy.net/index.php/Philosophy/the-philosophy-of-happiness-and-unhappiness.html#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator>Winton Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalphilosophy.net/?p=301#comment-2258</guid>
		<description>Very nice.
Your view of happiness seems close to mine. Emotional state is just one aspect of well-being. We should not be surprised that some people make sacrifices in their current emotional well-being in pursuit of other goals e.g. better education for their chldren or more security in retirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice.<br />
Your view of happiness seems close to mine. Emotional state is just one aspect of well-being. We should not be surprised that some people make sacrifices in their current emotional well-being in pursuit of other goals e.g. better education for their chldren or more security in retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The End of The End by Martin Walker</title>
		<link>http://rationalphilosophy.net/index.php/Philosophy/the-end-of-the-end.html#comment-2078</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalphilosophy.net/?p=296#comment-2078</guid>
		<description>Hello, Susan.

Good to hear from you!

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Susan.</p>
<p>Good to hear from you!</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The End of The End by Susan</title>
		<link>http://rationalphilosophy.net/index.php/Philosophy/the-end-of-the-end.html#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalphilosophy.net/?p=296#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>Thrilled you are back, as I always enjoy your thought-provoking posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thrilled you are back, as I always enjoy your thought-provoking posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meaning of Life by The purpose of life is to remain in existence &#171; Behold the man</title>
		<link>http://rationalphilosophy.net/index.php/meaning-of-life#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>The purpose of life is to remain in existence &#171; Behold the man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalphilosophy.net/meaning-of-life/#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>[...] purpose of life is to remain in&#160;existence  Meaning of Life Having come into existence, the purpose of life is to remain in existence…[read the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] purpose of life is to remain in&nbsp;existence  Meaning of Life Having come into existence, the purpose of life is to remain in existence…[read the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Will And Personal Development by Someone who gets the point of &#8216;free will&#8217; &#171; Behold the man</title>
		<link>http://rationalphilosophy.net/index.php/free-will-and-personal-development#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone who gets the point of &#8216;free will&#8217; &#171; Behold the man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalphilosophy.net/free-will-and-personal-development/#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>[...] who gets the point of &#8216;free&#160;will&#8217;  Free Will And Personal Development Acknowledging the power of choice, even if it is mechanistically illusory, can lead to profound and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who gets the point of &#8216;free&nbsp;will&#8217;  Free Will And Personal Development Acknowledging the power of choice, even if it is mechanistically illusory, can lead to profound and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscars and Art, Miracles and Myth by Bob Feigel</title>
		<link>http://rationalphilosophy.net/index.php/main/oscars-and-art-miracles-and-myth.html#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Feigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalphilosophy.net/main/oscars-and-art-miracles-and-myth/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>I discovered your site while trying to remember the name of a little church in New Mexico we visited fifteen years ago. My wife and I spent a week in Taos just before Christmas and visited several churches as well as Georgia O'Keeffe's home in Abiquiu. We were visiting the church to look at the architecture and religious art, not a miracle cure. In fact, we didn't know about that aspect of the church at Chimayo when we arrived.

I'd suffered several major back injuries when I was younger and, while shifting suitcases, had re-injured a troublesome vertebrae that had once been fractured. As a result, I was in a great deal of pain, finding it difficult to get in and out of bed - let alone a car - and walking with a cane.

We went into the church, looked around and went into the small room cum shrine at the back. Then we returned to the main sanctuary and sat in one of the pews.

When I got up to leave, the back pain was gone and complete mobility had returned. I haven't used the cane since.

Irrational? Don't ask me. All I know is that, after 36 years of on and off back pain, periods of immobility and the threat of corrective surgery, I haven't experienced any further back problems since that day at Chimayo. And if that's a miracle, then I'm all for them whether they're irrational or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I discovered your site while trying to remember the name of a little church in New Mexico we visited fifteen years ago. My wife and I spent a week in Taos just before Christmas and visited several churches as well as Georgia O&#8217;Keeffe&#8217;s home in Abiquiu. We were visiting the church to look at the architecture and religious art, not a miracle cure. In fact, we didn&#8217;t know about that aspect of the church at Chimayo when we arrived.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d suffered several major back injuries when I was younger and, while shifting suitcases, had re-injured a troublesome vertebrae that had once been fractured. As a result, I was in a great deal of pain, finding it difficult to get in and out of bed - let alone a car - and walking with a cane.</p>
<p>We went into the church, looked around and went into the small room cum shrine at the back. Then we returned to the main sanctuary and sat in one of the pews.</p>
<p>When I got up to leave, the back pain was gone and complete mobility had returned. I haven&#8217;t used the cane since.</p>
<p>Irrational? Don&#8217;t ask me. All I know is that, after 36 years of on and off back pain, periods of immobility and the threat of corrective surgery, I haven&#8217;t experienced any further back problems since that day at Chimayo. And if that&#8217;s a miracle, then I&#8217;m all for them whether they&#8217;re irrational or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Yorker, Obama: A Second Bite by George Myers</title>
		<link>http://rationalphilosophy.net/index.php/main/new-yorker-obama-a-second-bite.html#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>George Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalphilosophy.net/main/new-yorker-obama-a-second-bite.html#comment-159</guid>
		<description>The 60s revisited (or "recivided") had an adage about "white people go to the White House and black people go to jail". I found the NY Times in 1903 said that the prison on the Commons, now City Hall Park, was "...blacker than any Black Hole of Calcutta" in the American Revolution in NYC, investigating human burials there. Today, "the President has the power to arrest U.S. citizens and legal residents inside the U.S., and imprison them indefinitely in a military prison, without charging them with any crime, based on his assertion that the imprisoned individual is an "enemy combatant."  What's the difference between the occupying British and the current administration? A sorry state of affairs, almost "Alice in Texasland" in comparison to the historical facts that formed the nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 60s revisited (or &#8220;recivided&#8221;) had an adage about &#8220;white people go to the White House and black people go to jail&#8221;. I found the NY Times in 1903 said that the prison on the Commons, now City Hall Park, was &#8220;&#8230;blacker than any Black Hole of Calcutta&#8221; in the American Revolution in NYC, investigating human burials there. Today, &#8220;the President has the power to arrest U.S. citizens and legal residents inside the U.S., and imprison them indefinitely in a military prison, without charging them with any crime, based on his assertion that the imprisoned individual is an &#8220;enemy combatant.&#8221;  What&#8217;s the difference between the occupying British and the current administration? A sorry state of affairs, almost &#8220;Alice in Texasland&#8221; in comparison to the historical facts that formed the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oh, Lord: Profound Political Pandering by Shannon Wagner</title>
		<link>http://rationalphilosophy.net/index.php/main/oh-lord-profound-political-duplicity.html#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalphilosophy.net/main/oh-lord-profound-political-duplicity/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Thank you for putting a realistic "spin" on the actions of our default progressive candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for putting a realistic &#8220;spin&#8221; on the actions of our default progressive candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meaning of Life by Michael Warren</title>
		<link>http://rationalphilosophy.net/index.php/meaning-of-life#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalphilosophy.net/meaning-of-life/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Hi,

  Interested in what you're reaching for, as I'm writing a treatise on similar issues.  
  The way I see it, at the point of the Big Bang, nothing (or no-thing) begat time, the "laws of physics" and nearly infinite energy.  Almost instantly a plethora of various short-lived subatomic strings/particles came into existence which eventually interacted to form the basic particles and elements of matter as we know them.  Over billions of years this matter coalesced into various molecules and large masses such as stars, galaxies and in some cases, planets. 
  On some (or at least one) of these planets, some carbon based molecules were transformed by unique conditions into a form we call life.  Do we hypothesize that all the above steps--energy/strings/particles/atoms/ elements/molecules/stars/planets were part of a "purposeful" "evolving"  or that until the moment that life came into being, everything that had been going on (and still goes on) was "purposeless?"
  It seems to me that there has been a seeking of greater persistence of existence at work here, and life is one of the strategies that is being tried out.  The fact that the life strategy has in earth's case led to creatures who can perceive and seek to actually understand the 15 billion year old process at work--and even the "nothing" that lies behind it--may or may not be part of the "purpose."  It all depends, I guess, on whether one attributes a "purposefulness" to the origin of the Big Bang event or sees it as a random event (or one of an infinite number of such) emanating from a "purposeless" "place where there's no space or time."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>  Interested in what you&#8217;re reaching for, as I&#8217;m writing a treatise on similar issues.<br />
  The way I see it, at the point of the Big Bang, nothing (or no-thing) begat time, the &#8220;laws of physics&#8221; and nearly infinite energy.  Almost instantly a plethora of various short-lived subatomic strings/particles came into existence which eventually interacted to form the basic particles and elements of matter as we know them.  Over billions of years this matter coalesced into various molecules and large masses such as stars, galaxies and in some cases, planets.<br />
  On some (or at least one) of these planets, some carbon based molecules were transformed by unique conditions into a form we call life.  Do we hypothesize that all the above steps&#8211;energy/strings/particles/atoms/ elements/molecules/stars/planets were part of a &#8220;purposeful&#8221; &#8220;evolving&#8221;  or that until the moment that life came into being, everything that had been going on (and still goes on) was &#8220;purposeless?&#8221;<br />
  It seems to me that there has been a seeking of greater persistence of existence at work here, and life is one of the strategies that is being tried out.  The fact that the life strategy has in earth&#8217;s case led to creatures who can perceive and seek to actually understand the 15 billion year old process at work&#8211;and even the &#8220;nothing&#8221; that lies behind it&#8211;may or may not be part of the &#8220;purpose.&#8221;  It all depends, I guess, on whether one attributes a &#8220;purposefulness&#8221; to the origin of the Big Bang event or sees it as a random event (or one of an infinite number of such) emanating from a &#8220;purposeless&#8221; &#8220;place where there&#8217;s no space or time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The New Philanthropy: Interview with Craig of Craigslist by bad visa</title>
		<link>http://rationalphilosophy.net/index.php/httprationalphilosophynetmainthe-new-philanthropy-an-interview-with-craig-newmark#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>bad visa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalphilosophy.net/182/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Nice Site!
http://google.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Site!<br />
<a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow">http://google.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
